The Holding Tank

Home Page Photography

Photography RSS 2.0 Feed

| Photos & Themes RSS | Hardware | Technical | Links | Books and Magazines  | Downloads |

Hardware

| Lens Data and Reviews | Lens Selection | Long Lens Selection | Wide Range Zooms | Consumer Zooms |

Macro Equipment |  Tilt and Shift Lenses | My Bags | My Old Hardware |

| My New Hardware | Lens MTF Comparison | Lens Tests | Weather Protection | Canon AF System | 7D vs 20D ISO Performance | Micro Adjust Experience with the 7D |

Lens Tests

| EF 28mm f1.8 USM | EF 50mm f1.4 USM | EF 100mm f2.8 Macro USM |

| EF 180mm f3.5L Macro | EF 180mm f3.5L Macro + EF 1.4X II  | EF 180mm f3.5L Macro + EF 2X II |

| EF 200mm f2.8L II | EF 200mm f2.8L II + EF 1.4X II | EF 200mm f2.8L II + EF 2X II | EF 200mm f2.8L II + EF 1.4X II+ EF 2X II |

| EF 300mm f4L IS | EF 300mm f4L IS + EF 1.4X II | EF 300mm f4L IS + EF 2X II | EF 300mm f4L IS + EF 1.4X II + EF 2X II |

| EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 | EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 USM | EF 17-40 f4L USM | EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM |

| Primes | 17mm Region | 24mm Region | 28mm Region | 35mm Region | 50mm Region | 100mm Region | 300mm Region | 400mm Region | 600mm Region |

| EF 180mm f3.5L Macro + TCs | EF 200mm f2.8L II + TCs | EF 300mm f4L IS USM + TCs | Tests With the Kenko TC | Macro Tests |

| Filter Effect on Sharpness and AF | Flare and Filters | Image Stabilizer Tests | TC Sharpness | Best of the Best | Method | Understanding the Results | Real World 100% Crops | Tripod Tests | L-Plate Test |

 

Flare Tests

 | EF 28mm f1.8 USM | EF 50mm f1.4 USM | EF 100mm f2.8 Macro USM |

| EF 200mm f2.8L I| USM | EF 300mm f4L IS USM |

| EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 USM | EF 17-40 f4L USM | EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM | Brand/Grade Test | Filter Data | Protective Filter FAQ |

 

Serious Real World Flare Case

Introduction

Test Setup

Test Setup Validation

Results

Conclusions

 

 

Introduction

This test involves taking shots with the sun on the diagonal (centre to corner) both in and out of the APS-C frame with a shadow background.

As such this is very much a daylight worse case.

Test Setup

The camera was set on manual and the exposure set for the shadowed foreground, being f11. 1/4 or 0.3 sec ISO 100 for the EF 28mm f1.8 USM  and EF 17-40mm f4L @ 28mm. The sun was low on the horizon maximizing the contrast available resulting in an extreme against the light situation.

The test was conducted handheld with no attempt to use the same sun locations for each lens, this was to minimize the duration of the test so the light conditions were as unchanged as possible. 

An additional reference shot was taken with the sun's disk shaded by a hand.

The seen light by the sun had an evaluative exposure of 1/200 f4 ISO 100 resulting in a shadow to sunlight exposure difference of 8.6 stops.

In the case of the disk of the sun being in frame (or at least not shielded by the lens hood) the disk of the sun has a luminance of about 1,000,000,000 cd/m2 and that of a sunlit scene is around 100,000 cd/m2 [Ref]. This is a source to scene luminance ratio of 10000:1 or about 13.3 stops.

So in this test the luminance difference between the disk of the sun and the shadow scene is a total of about 22 stops.

This is much higher than the controlled test conditions difference of about 16 stops.

Results

The results are presented in tables for as shot (metered for shadow) and digitally reduced by 4 stops.

Firstly for the EF 28mm f1.8

As Shot As Shot -4 Stops

Ref Shot

 

Secondly for the EF 17-40mm f4L @ 28mm

As Shot As Shot -4 Stops

Ref Shot

 

 

Conclusions

Although the above lens tests can not be directly compared angle for angle,  there seems to be a similar order-of-magnitude of flare for the two lenses with the EF 28mm f1.8 slightly worse than the EF 17-40mm f4L, this is probably to be expected of a fast wide angle.

The above test were conducted with Hoya SHMC Pro1 filters fitted. However the controlled experiments showed that in both cases (28mm and 17-40 @ 28mm) the lens flared before the filter and any filter flare was second order at least.

The above results also agree with the controlled case tests in that the zoom is somewhat better controlled than the prime.

It seems this case is extremely harsh, a full 6 stops worse than the controlled test case, and it seems unlikely any lens would not flare under these conditions.

 

Last Updated 05/06/2008

All Content © 2005-10 Lester Wareham All Rights Reserved     

All material is supplied  as is and without warranty, use at your own risk.  

All opinions stated are the authors own.

All quoted information remains the copyright of the respective authors.

Any trade marks mentioned are the property of their owners.

  

Contact: (anti spam remove underscores)

Note this email gets spammed a lot so if you want to get your message through please prefix "Holding Tank" in the title

f_ w_ a_ r_ e_ 9_ 0_ @_l_i_n_e_o_n_e_._n_e_t